...but why couldn't 9 show up and hang out with 10? Why couldn't we have a mini-season called Doctors Who and there could be squeeing and awesomeness for six glorious episodes? And bring Cap'n Jack, too. Just for funsies. Man. 9, 10, and Jack. That would be the BEST party.
There's probably some dumb paradox law that Timelords have to obey, but if I were 9 or 10, I'd say, fie on thee, rules, I'm the LAST effing Timelord, and I want to hang with myself, because myself is awesome.
More dumb questions as I think of them.
There's probably some dumb paradox law that Timelords have to obey, but if I were 9 or 10, I'd say, fie on thee, rules, I'm the LAST effing Timelord, and I want to hang with myself, because myself is awesome.
More dumb questions as I think of them.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:23 am (UTC)That being said, YES PLEASE.
Although I think I'd spontaneously combust from the awesome.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 04:02 am (UTC)The Three Doctors
The Five Doctors
The Two Doctors
And possibly some from radio.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:33 pm (UTC)So, it's totally plausible and possible!
*starts staring at Christopher Eccleston until he does my bidding*
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 09:36 am (UTC)As has already been said, there's a whole bunch of multi Doctor stories of which I have the fondest memories of The Five Doctors, firstly cos it's ace and secondly because I was ten:)
But yeah, '9, 10 and Jack Harkness walk into a bar' style stories would just be brilliant:)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:34 pm (UTC)congressmanthe BBC.no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 02:20 pm (UTC)Or, hell, just the banter alone would be enough to knock me over with the awesome...
Wow. I'm going to be distracted all day. *g*
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-28 12:49 am (UTC)because 7 ate 9?
...sorry. it made as much sense as the rest of it to me...